Please note: this review has now been discontinued.

What is the aim of the review?
To examine how current terrestrial vegetation monitoring and surveillance methods compare in their ability to reliably assess state and/or magnitude, direction and rate of change in state. A secondary question will be addressed as follows: "Are similarities and differences in the power of monitoring and surveillance methods to assess state and/or magnitude, direction and rate of change in state consistent across spatial scale, temporal scale, geographical area, assemblage characteristics, observer, type of question addressed and resources available?"

Who's in the review team?

• Sue Hearn - School of Environment and Natural Resources, Bangor University, UK
• John Healey
• Morag McDonald
• Terry Rowell
• Gavin Stewart
• Jenny Wong
  

At what stage is the review?
The review protocol has now been finalised and the review is underway. Please check this page again soon for further progress updates.

Comments?
If you would like to comment on any aspect of this review, please email us. Your feedback is appreciated.