Banner image
Are marine protected areas effective tools for sustainable fisheries management? I. Biodiversity impacts of marine reserves in the temperate zone

 

 

 

 

What is the aim of the review?
To systematically collate and synthesise published and unpublished evidence in order to determine the impacts of establishing temperate zone no take areas on density, biomass and species richness of marine biota within reserve boundaries. The review also aimed to ascertain whether the impacts of no take areas vary in relation to taxon, reserve parameters or organism parameters.

Who's in the review team?

At what stage is the review?
This review is now complete.

What is the rationale?
Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) have been proposed and designated as a mechanism to address the problem of achieving sustainable fisheries, while simultaneously preserving biodiversity. However, empirical studies and research syntheses indicate that there is considerable variation in the ecological effects of MPAs and there is considerable debate over whether they can produce fisheries benefits.

The Joint Nature Conservation Committee (UK government body) proposed the question at a stakeholder meeting of the Natural Environment Research Council Knowledge Transfer, Science into Policy group. Definition of question elements and the development of a protocol was subsequently undertaken under the guidance of the JNCC and with wider consultation of the scientific community.

How were the results obtained?
A number of electronic databases were searched for information using a range of search terms. Internet searches were conducted in order to retrieve any relevant grey literature. In addition, the bibliographies of relevant articles were examined for useful references. 3531 references were identified through the search strategy; 34 of these were accepted into the final review having met all inclusion criteria.

What did the review find?

To read more about this review, its findings, and the implications for conservationists and researchers, please see the Summary or Full Report.

Comments?
If you would like to comment on any aspect of this review, please email us. Your feedback is appreciated.

Document Links

- Summary  

- Full Review   

- Supplementary material pdf
 
- Protocol     

-Policy Brief

Jacks

 

Copyright © 2010 Collaboration for Environmental Evidence
Maintained & developed by CEBC